Thursday, November 15, 2012

Did President Obama & His Justice Department Extort Money From BP?


Did President Obama and the U.S. Department of Justice extort the billion-dollar damage settlement with BP for its 2010 accidental spill off the Gulf Coast?

Based on legal arguments being made in a U.S. court, Chevron would have you believe so.

Chevron has accused the Ecuadorian indigenous groups and their lawyers suing the oil giant for massive oil contamination in the Amazon rainforest of extorting money from the company by applying pressure on its executives to settle.

In a brief filed recently with the Southern District Court of New York, the Ecuadorians’ lawyer Craig Smyser argued:  (See here, page 4.) 

“Chevron fallaciously argues that any effort to effectuate a settlement is part of an organized crime scheme. Hogwash. The argument turns every settlement conference into a meeting of crime bosses. Under Chevron’s reasoning, the meetings and public discourse among the United States Government, plaintiffs’ lawyers, and British Petroleum concerning settlement of the Deep-Water Horizon oil spill dispute were a RICO scheme.”

Well, today, BP and the DOJ announced a settlement agreement but no mention by BP of possible extortion or racketeering charges. See this Chevron Pit, comparing the accidental BP spill to the intentional contamination by Chevron of the Ecuadorian rainforest.

Chevron also has accused Ecuador President Rafeal Correa of being part of the racketeering conspiracy to extort money from the oil giant because he expressed concern for people living near Chevron’s contamination.

“They will pay for the mess they’ve made,” he said. But, wait, that wasn’t President Correa.  That was President Obama.

From the White House web site: 

“So let’s be clear about a few things: BP is responsible for -- and will be held accountable for – all of the very significant clean-up and containment costs. They will pay for the mess they’ve made….The bottom line is that the Administration will aggressively pursue compensation from BP for any damages from this spill.”
Aggressively pursue?  Be careful, Mr. President. If Chevron has its way, every government official, lawyer, lobbyist, PR consultant or even CEO working in tandem to collect damages, possibly through a settlement, could be facing extortion charges, filed by companies with executives who would rather fight in court than be held accountable for their misconduct. 

Become a follower of The Chevron Pit.
Also follow us on Twitter at @ChevronPit and like us on Facebook.
Visit and watch a video on ChevronToxico.com to find out more.
Support Amazon Watch and Rainforest Action Network.

BP Held Accountable For Deaths & Oil Spill; Chevron Remains Fugitive From Justice


Today BP got hit with four arrests for manslaughter and lying to Congress and $3 to $5 billion in federal fines for the ACCIDENTAL oil spill that resulted in 11 deaths and an estimated $40 billion plus in damages to individuals and local businesses. The U.S. Department of Justice is expected to announce a settlement deal later today. It will not include civil claims under the Clean Water Act and other legislation,  pending private civil claims and state claims for economic loss, which means the total cost to BP could be $40 to $60 billion for a spill that was remediated, at least on the surface, in a few months.  See here.

This news is in stark contrast to the legal battle against Chevron for massive oil contamination in Ecuador. Chevron has refused to pay a $19 billion judgment awarded last year by an Ecuador court, forcing the Ecuadorians to file lawsuits in other countries to seize company assets as payment.  

Consider this:

1) The damages in the Ecuadorian rainforest was intentional, not accidental. Chevron designed, built and operated its drilling system in Ecuador to pollute in order to maximize its profits there.

2) Chemical toxins and pure crude have been leeching into the soil and waterways for five decades, while Chevron has fought the Ecuadorians' lawsuit for damages for 20 years. U.S. courts forced the Ecuadorians to try their case in Ecuador, delaying a judgment by a decade. BP cleaned its contamination in a few months.

3) At least 1,400 people have died from cancer and thousands more have oil-related illnesses resulting from Chevron's contamination.  The BP spill resulted in 11 deaths and damage to wildlife and other environmental impacts.

4) Chevron dumped 16 billion gallons of oil and toxic water into the soil and waterways and built 900 huge unlined pits to store pure crude and toxic water. The BP spill occurred off shore and is not believed to be a threat (at least for now) to humans and wildlife.

5) Chevron, U.S. oil analysts and the U.S. media laughed at early damage estimates against Chevron ranging from $16 to $27 billion in Ecuador. BP will likely pay up to $60 billion in damages.

It's hard not to conclude that a U.S. life is just worth more than an Ecuadorian life. BP is being held accountable for its mistake, but Chevron remains a fugitive from justice for its intentional crimes. 

Become a follower of The Chevron Pit.
Also follow us on Twitter at @ChevronPit and like us on Facebook.
Visit and watch a video on ChevronToxico.com to find out more.
Support Amazon Watch and Rainforest Action Network.



Monday, November 12, 2012

Chevron’s Latest “Defense” In Ecuador Case: Hide Assets In Subsidiaries


After a dreadful series of legal setbacks, it sure didn’t take long for Chevron to come up with a new tricked-up defense to evade the $19 billion Ecuador environmental judgment.

Like Chevron’s many other failed defenses in the Ecuador case, this one won’t wash either.

Let’s review how we got here.

The company’s first line of defense in the 1990s was we didn’t really dump billions of gallons of toxic waste into the rainforest.  That lie was put to rest by multiple courts around the world based on overwhelming scientific evidence, as confirmed by numerous independent media outlets such as 60 Minutes.

Then, Chevron tried to claim that the devastated communities in Ecuador sued the wrong party.  According to Chevron, they should have sued Texaco, the company that operated in Ecuador.  That argument was rejected out of hand by appellate courts in Ecuador and the U.S.

Then the company blamed Petroecuador, Ecuador’s state-owned oil company and Texaco’s former partner in Ecuador.  But various courts rejected that defense after evidence surfaced that Chevron’s predecessor company was the exclusive operator of the oil concession in Ecuador.

When that defense failed, Chevron tried to claim Ecuador’s government released it from any clean-up obligations.  But courts found this so-called “release” did not cover the private claims of the rainforest communities, and in any event was a product of fraud.

Left with virtually no options, Chevron then tried to coax New York federal Judge Lewis A. Kaplan to enjoin the villagers from enforcing the Ecuador judgment anywhere in the world.  This unprecedented action caused an international furor, and a U.S. appellate court quickly reversed Kaplan.

When Chevron hired the respected litigator Ted Olson to appeal that setback to the U.S. Supreme Court, the company was rejected yet again.   By this point, nobody seemed to be able to put lipstick on Chevron’s pig.

So what’s left?

Well, now Chevron claims that its 73 revenue-producing subsidiaries around the world should be off-limits to the Ecuadorian villagers as they try to collect on the $19 billion judgment.

Consider the absurdity of Chevron’s latest gambit.  The company discloses in its annual report that almost all of its revenues are generated from subsidiaries around the world which are managed by the parent company from its global headquarters in California.

So according to Chevron, if you win a lawsuit against the parent company it simply won’t pay up.  Yet at the same time, its subsidiaries are off limits because their assets are not really owned by Chevron or connected to its activities in Ecuador.   Chevron already stripped almost all of its assets from Ecuador.

The order by the Argentine court last week to freeze Chevron assets in that country – a shareholder shocker if there ever was one -- was met with an apoplectic response at the company’s headquarters. “The plaintiffs' lawyers have no legal right to embargo subsidiary assets in Argentina," huffed spokesman James Craig.

Yes they do, James.  Hiding behind subsidiaries to avoid paying liabilities is now considered an antiquated notion in the legal world.  It rarely if ever works, particularly when the judgment is out of the country where you wanted the trial held and where you promised to pay up if you lost.

There’s another reason Chevron spokesman Craig is out of sorts.

Chevron discloses that about 80% of its annual revenue comes from subsidiaries outside of the U.S. Chevron’s subsidiaries in Canada and Argentina, two countries where the affected communities have filed seizure actions, produce an annual revenue stream of $2 billion to $3 billion for the parent company.   The rainforest communities can collect the full amount of their judgment in a few years just be diverting those funds to a clean-up.

The arithmetic Chevron-style works like this: when it comes to counting $240 billion in annual revenue collected from subsidiaries around the world, Chevron is as proud as a peacock.  Every penny counts.  But when it comes to paying out its environmental liabilities, there is nothing in the piggy bank.

We now get it. Under Chevron’s twisted logic, after fighting in court for almost two decades, the Ecuadorian who are suffering from cancer and birth defects now have no place to collect their winning judgment.  This is how a large oil company convinces itself that it is entitled to impunity for its human rights crimes.

It is well-documented that Chevron’s management team, led by CEO John Watson and General Counsel R. Hewitt Pate, is mired in conflicts of interest when it comes to Ecuador. Watson gave Pate a 75% raise last year – for a total compensation of $7.8 million -- after he lost the Ecuador case.  The company has admitted under oath that it faces “irreparable harm” from the Ecuador judgment but outside court it claims the risk is no big deal.

Any court in the civilized world that hears this case will not allow Chevron to manipulate the corporate form in this fashion.  The company is acting like a Deadbeat Dad fleeing a jurisdiction to avoid a child support payment.

The day of reckoning for Chevron management is fast approaching.


Become a follower of The Chevron Pit.
Also follow us on Twitter at @ChevronPit and like us on Facebook.
Visit and watch a video on ChevronToxico.com to find out more.




Saturday, November 10, 2012

Which Is It? Chevron Tells Shareholders Ecuador Case Under Control But Swears To U.S. Courts It's A "Nightmare"


In his recent blog, Shareholder Shocker: Chevron's Assets Frozen in ArgentinaAmazon Watch's Kevin Koenig explores the lack of shareholder disclosure and the outright lies Chevron is telling its investors about its Ecuadorian legal battles, including a recent ruling in Argentina to freeze up to $19 billion of Chevron's assets in the South American country as payment for the historic judgment out of Ecuador.

Here's what Chevron lawyer Randy Mastro told a U.S. court not that long ago about the Ecuadorians' efforts to collect on their $19 billion judgment for massive oil contamination: 

"So we are definitely right now in a position of that nightmare is here, irreparable harm is imminent…[We] are facing the ultimate Sword of Damocles, and it is over our heads…The Sword of Damocles is not over our heads, it's touching our foreheads.”

Touching our foreheads?  

Here's what Chevron wrote in its public filing to shareholders: 

“Management does not believe an estimate of a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss) can be made in this case...the highly uncertain legal environment surrounding the case provides no basis for management to estimate a reasonably possible loss (or a range of loss).”

Which is it, Chevron? 

Read more of Koenig's blog here.




Become a follower of The Chevron Pit.
Also follow us on Twitter at @ChevronPit and like us on Facebook.
Visit and watch a video on ChevronToxico.com to find out more.
Support Amazon Watch and Rainforest Action Network.


Thursday, November 8, 2012

Hell Froze Over As Argentina Embargoes Chevron's $2 Billion In Assets


Yesterday, hell froze over when an Argentine court embargoed or, in effect, froze up to potentially $19 billion in Chevron assets in the South American country.

Now it's time to fight it out on the ice.

Chevron, which now has about $2 billion in assets in Argentina, has sworn it will never pay a dime to cleanup the contamination it left behind in the Ecuadorian rainforest. Said former General Counsel Charles James: "Not till hell freezes over, and then we will fight it out on the ice."

Chevron has defied Ecuador's courts, refusing to pay an enforceable $19 billion judgment and forcing the Ecuadorians to file lawsuits to seize assets in Ecuador, Brazil, Canada and Argentina to obtain the damage award for one of the world's largest oil-related environmental disasters.

The Ecuadorians and their lawyers -- some of the top litigators in these four countries -- have their skates on.

See the press release below and read more details here and here in Kevin Koenig's Amazon Watch blog:

BUENOS AIRES, /CSRwire/ - In a major blow to Chevron’s effort to avoid paying a historic $19 billion environmental judgment in Ecuador, an Argentine judge today signed the first of what is expected to be many orders freezing billions of dollars of assets owned by the U.S. oil company.

The order, signed by Civil Judge Adrian Elcuj Miranda of the Commercial Court of Justice in Buenos Aries, freezes almost all Chevron assets in Argentina pending enforcement of the Ecuador judgment. The embargo applies to 100% of Chevron's capital in Argentina, 100% of dividends, all of Chevron's stake in pipeline operator Oleoductos del Valle SA, 40% of Chevron's oil sales to Argentine refineries, and 40% of the money Chevron has deposited in Argentine banks, said Enrique Bruchou, the lawyer who represents the indigenous and farmer communities in Ecuador who brought the lawsuit.

In 2011, Chevron was found liable in Ecuador for dumping billions of gallons of toxic waste into the Amazon rainforest, decimating indigenous groups and causing an outbreak of cancer and other oil-related health problems. A video on the case can be seen here; a written summary of the evidence can be read here; and a segment from the U.S. news show 60 Minutes on the case can be viewed here.

Since Chevron has refused to pay the Ecuador judgment despite submitting to jurisdiction there, lawyers for the affected rainforest communities filed an action last week to seize the oil giant's assets in Argentina. The affected communities filed asset seizure actions against Chevron in the last few weeks in Canada, Brazil, and Ecuador.

Chevron has at least $2 billion worth of assets in Argentina, said Bruchou.  The freeze order applies to the entire $19 billion amount of the Ecuador judgment, meaning that Chevron will effectively be barred from investing further in Argentina unless it wants to risk seizure of those assets as well.

“We are now on the fast track to collection in our two-decade struggle to force Chevron to clean up its awful environmental disaster,” said Luis Yanza, the Ecuadorian community organizer and driving force behind the lawsuit since it was filed in 1993.

“We are committed to holding Chevron fully accountable for the crimes it has committed against our indigenous peoples,” he added.

The move by the Argentine judge is the first time the plaintiffs have been successful in freezing assets outside their home territory of Ecuador.  The assets will remain frozen until the court rules whether it will enforce the Ecuador judgment, which is expected to be relatively smooth given that the nation has signed a reciprocal enforcement treaty in the region that includes Ecuador.

The legal action in Argentina derives its authority in part from an international treaty in Latin America called the Inter-American Convention on the Execution of Preventive Measures. The treaty, which dates from the late 1970s, allows for the automatic freezing of assets of a defendant that fails to abide by the law and refuses to pay a final foreign judgment.

The Preventive Measures treaty has been ratified by Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, Paraguay, Guatemala, and Uruguay. Venezuela and Chile have signed the treaty but not ratified it.

In all, the amount of Chevron assets in the four countries where enforcement actions are pending are worth at least $10 billion based on the latest estimates, said Pablo Fajardo, the lead Ecuadorian lawyer.  Seizure actions will continue to be filed against Chevron assets in more countries to make sure the full amount of the judgment is collected, he added.

Bruchou, a native of Buenos Aries, founded his firm in 1990 after working for several years at the U.S. law firm Shearman & Sterling.  International Financial Law Review named his firm, Bruchou Fernandez Madero & Lombardi, the best in Argentina for five consecutive years. Bruchou himself was named “Law Firm Leader of the Year” in 2011 by the prestigious Latin Lawyer magazine.

In a press conference last week in Buenos Aires, Bruchou said that enforcement of the Ecuador judgment in Argentina and other Latin American countries will signal to foreign investors that they should apply the same environmental standards they use at home to areas where vulnerable indigenous and farmer communities are located.  “We ask for no more than that and no less than that,” he said.  “We call it responsible foreign investment.”

Just recently, a court in Ecuador ordered the seizure of an estimated $200 million in Chevron’s assets in that country, which include bank accounts and a $96.3 million debt owed the oil giant by Ecuador’s government.

The area of Ecuadorian rainforest affected by Chevron’s toxic dumping was once one of the most bio-diverse ecosystems on the planet.  It is home to hundreds of plant and animal species but has been pockmarked with more than 900 open-air toxic waste pits left by Chevron, which operated in Ecuador under the Texaco brand.

Soil tests of Chevron wells sites during the Ecuador trial indicated the oil giant left massive quantities of cancer-causing hydrocarbons, sometimes at levels hundreds of times higher than permissible norms.  Approximately 9,000 people are expected to contract cancer as a result if there is no immediate clean-up, according to a study by Dr. Daniel Rourke, former of the Rand Corporation.  See here.

"We have fought now for almost two decades to correct the injustice created by Chevron in Ecuador,” said Fajardo, who grew up in Ecuador’s oil fields and is the recipient of a CNN Hero Award.

"While Chevron might think it can ignore court orders in Ecuador, it will be impossible for Chevron to ignore court orders in countries where it maintains substantial assets,” he added.  "The decision of the Argentine judge proves that the sentence in Ecuador is legitimate and will be enforced in any country that observes the rule of law."

The action in Argentina comes just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court denied Chevron’s attempt to block enforcement of the judgment and the oil giant itself suffered a devastating series of courtroom setbacks. In May, Chevron CEO John Watson suffered a stunning reprimand when investors holding 38% of the company’s shares voted for a resolution that found he mishandled the Ecuador case.

Watson’s former lawyer, Charles James, has said Chevron will fight the Ecuador judgment “until hell freezes over, and then skate it out on the ice.”  However, Chevron Comptroller Rex Mitchell recently testified in New York fedeal court that the seizure actions filed by the Ecuadorians would cause “irreparable harm” to company operations.


Become a follower of The Chevron Pit.
Also follow us on Twitter at @ChevronPit and like us on Facebook.
Visit and watch a video on ChevronToxico.com to find out more.

Friday, November 2, 2012

Not Chump Change: $2 Billion In Chevron Assets Likely Frozen In Argentina Soon


The Ecuadorians, who recently won a $19 billion judgment against Chevron for oil contamination in the Amazon rainforest, have filed a lawsuit in Argentina, asking a court to freeze $2 billion in Chevron's Argentina assets as partial payment for the judgment. Chevron has refused to pay, even though the Ecuadorian courts have ordered the company to do so, and U.S. courts have said the judgment can be enforced. Chevron has few assets in Ecuador.

The chances of the Ecuadorians' collecting are good because Argentina and Ecuador have an agreement that they treat each other's court decisions as their own. Chevron's shareholders should be concerned because $2 billion ain't chump change.

Read more here:

Ecuador Villagers Seek $2 Billion of Chevron Assets In Argentina

Buenos Aires, Argentina – Indigenous groups and villagers from Ecuador are filing suit today to freeze an estimated $2 billion of Chevron assets in Argentina to help pay for a remediation of the extensive toxic pollution left by the oil giant on their ancestral lands in the Amazon rainforest, representatives of the communities announced.

The move is the fourth legal action filed to enforce a $19 billion judgment in Ecuador against Chevron for creating what experts believe is the world's worst oil-related contamination, dubbed the "Rainforest Chernobyl" by local communities. Earlier legal actions were filed this year against Chevron assets in Canada, Brazil, and Ecuador.

Brought by the prominent lawyer Enrique Bruchou, the action in Argentina differs from the earlier seizure actions in that it derives its authority in part from an international treaty in Latin America called the Inter-American Convention on the Execution of Preventive Measures. The treaty, which dates from the late 1970s, allows for the automatic freezing of assets of a defendant that fails to abide by the law and refuses to pay a final foreign judgment.

The Preventive Measures treaty has been ratified by Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, Paraguay, Guatemala, and Uruguay. Venezuela and Chile have signed the treaty, but have not ratified it.

Chevron maintains oil operations and bank accounts in Argentina worth about $2 billion, said Bruchou and Pablo Fajardo, the lawyer representing dozens of indigenous and farmer communities in Ecuador. Chevron's operations in Argentina produce about 26,000 barrels of crude and 4 million cubic feet of natural gas daily.

In all, the amount of Chevron assets in the four countries are worth at least an estimated $8 billion, said Fajardo. Because the judgment in Ecuador against Chevron is for $19.04 billion, seizure actions will continue to be filed against Chevron assets in more countries to make sure the full amount of the judgment is collected, he added.

Bruchou, a native of Buenos Aries, founded his firm in 1990 after working for several years at the U.S. law firm Shearman & Sterling. International Financial Law Review named his law firm, Bruchou Fernandez Madero & Lombardi the best in Argentina for five consecutive years. Bruchou himself was named "Law Firm Leader of the Year" in 2011 by the prestigious Latin Lawyer magazine.

In a press conference in Buenos Aires on Wednesday, Bruchou said that enforcement of the Ecuador judgment in Argentina and other Latin American countries will signal to foreign investors that they should apply the same environmental standards they use at home to areas where vulnerable indigenous and farmer communities are located. "We ask for no more than that and no less than that," he said. "We call it responsible foreign investment."

Just recently, a court in Ecuador ordered the seizure of an estimated $200 million in Chevron's assets in that country, which include bank accounts and a $96.3 million debt owed the oil giant by Ecuador's government. Any further investments that Chevron tries to make in the four countries would be subject to seizure and auction, said Fajardo.

The case originally was filed in the U.S. in 1993, but shifted to Ecuador in 2002 at Chevron's request after the oil company praised the courts there as fair and transparent.

After an eight-year trial, the court in Ecuador found in 2011 that Chevron admitted to deliberately dumping billions of gallons of toxic waste into Amazon waterways, decimating indigenous groups and creating an epidemic of cancer that has killed or threatens to kill thousands of people. A video on the case can be seen here; a written summary of the evidence can be read here; and a segment from the U.S. news show 60 Minutes on the case can be viewed here.

The area affected by Chevron's toxic dumping was once one of the most bio-diverse ecosystems on the planet.

Luis Yanza, a representative of the dozens of rainforest communities that brought the lawsuit, praised the filing of the action in Argentina. "The time has come to use the force of law to obligate Chevron to correct its atrocious behavior in our country," Yanza said.

"We have fought now for almost two decades to correct the injustice created by Chevron in Ecuador," said Fajardo, who grew up in Ecuador's oil fields and is the recipient of a CNN Hero Award. "While Chevron might think it can ignore court orders in Ecuador, it will be impossible for Chevron to ignore court orders in countries where it maintains substantial assets," he added.

The action in Argentina comes just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court denied Chevron's attempt to block enforcement of the judgment, while numerous other U.S. courts have flatly rejected the oil giant's claim that the judgment was the product of "fraud". In May, Chevron CEO John Watson suffered a stunning reprimand when investors holding 38% of the company's shares voted for a resolution that found he mishandled the Ecuador case.


Become a follower of The Chevron Pit.
Also follow us on Twitter at @ChevronPit and like us on Facebook.
Visit and watch a video on ChevronToxico.com to find out more.